Top 10 Hybrid mobile application development technology considerations

PhoneGap

---

PhoneGap is an Open source technology to develop hybrid mobile applications using web technologies like HTML/CSS and JavaScript. PhoneGap is very popular hybrid mobile application tool among hybrid mobile application development companies in USA. PhoneGap uses JavaScript to access device level APIs similar to native app.

Pros:

• Uses web technologies lie HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript
• Easily available source
• This is write one time and run anywhere – Android, iOS, Windows, Firefox OS, BlackBerry etc.
• Available in Google Pay Store for Android, integrated payments via App Store for iOS and in-app and more

Cons:

• Poor performance for graphic-intensive applications
• Plugins are available however many are outdated or unsupported based on target platform.

Xamarin

---

Xamarin, newly Microsoft acquired technology, is used to build native mobile applications with cross platform compatibility. It uses portable C# code. All codes are written using C# that developer can do in Java, Swift or Objective-C unlike other platforms. Xamarin studio is user friend IDE for the app development.

Pros:

• Development is using C# so no need to learn near programming language
• Xamarin studio is highly user friendly IDE
• Code reusability is very high (almost 75%) across major mobile platforms like iOS, Windows, Android etc.
• Android Emulator for quality testing.

Cons:

• Many open-source libraries for iOS, Android etc. have compatibility issues with Xamarin

Onsen UI

---

This is an open source framework and technology to build hybrid mobile apps using native looking components. AngularJS can also be used to build the apps. It has good documentation that includes good examples and layouts for common features.

Pros:

• This works with predefined components
• Faster development as it is based on predefined components
• Good documentation with common features and examples

Cons:

• PhoneGap/Cordova builder not included, but supported
• Currently does not support material Design
• Onsen UI currently offers only an iOS theme
   

Appcelerator

---

Appcelerator is the technology used to build native apps using JavaScript technology . This is an enterprise based development platform allowing writing JavaScript with MVC framework.>

Pros:

• Pre-built database connection for MS Azure, MongoDB, MS SQL and other database engines.
• Consists of schema-less data store, ArrowDB, to deploy data models with zero setup efforts.
• Allows rapid mobile app development
• Quick prototype development with less time and effort for evaluation

Cons:

• Pre-built database connection for MS Azure, MongoDB, MS SQL and other database engines.
• Consists of schema-less data store, ArrowDB, to deploy data models with zero setup efforts.
• Allows rapid mobile app development
• Quick prototype development with less time and effort for evaluation
• Little buggy and laggy, though newere versions are more stable.
• Poor support from developers community

Intel XDK

---

Intel XDK is another popular platform to develop native apps for mobile phones and tablets using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Cordova platform is used to compile apps making them cross-platform compatible.

Pros:

• Developer can compile same solution for different platform.
• HTML, CSS and JavaScript are used as technology for app development.

Cons:

• “Native code” component of a plugin is not supported by simulator
• Device simulator’s emulation of the App Security API does not provide any real security

Nativescript

---

Nativescript is an open-source platform for making native cross-platform mobile applications. Nativescript gives mobile application development companies , every native APIs in JavaScript. It offers reusability of existing plugins from npm directly.

Pros:

• Embedded support for TypeScript and js 2.
• Direct access to native APIs in place of development libraries access and then utilize native components.

Cons:

• Multi-threading is an issue in Nativescript.
• Lack of in-depth examples and documentation on features and its usage.
   

Telerik AppBuilder

---

The Telerik Platform is popular cross-platform mobile application development tool and it also supports native apps developing for iOS, Android and Windows phones. Appbuilder IDE supports Production of cross-platform and native applications both. AppBuilder also equipped with the Apache Cordova API.

Pros:

• Easy to develop cross-platform application.
• It is compatible with .NET, JavaScript/HTML5, Java JSP and PHP technologies.
• Easy to learn

Cons:

• It's not a free tool.
• One can convert all steps to code, but can't revert them back.
   

Monocross

---

Monocross is an open source cross-platform for mobile application development. It is used to create applications for Android phones and tablets, Windows Phone and iPads and iPhones. It uses .NET C# and the Mono framework for developing cross-platform supported applications.

 

Pros:

• Need only C# and .NET compatibility for the application development and maintenance activities.
• Provides access to full power of the native device APIs still using C#

Cons:

• Documentation and resource available for Monocross framework is harder for application development.
•  

React Native

---

React native supports creation of proper native apps in place of hybrid ones that run in Webview. JavaScript and React are used as technology for mobile app development. It also supports Android.

Pros:

• Native-like performance
• Great community support

Cons:

• The development tools only work on OS X at the moment
• Steep learning curve

Ionic

---

Ionic is a popular framework of mobile app development companies for Hybrid mobile apps. One can use CSS to create native looking designs and best to pair with AngularJS. It also provides command-line interface that includes integrated emulators and a Cordova based app packager.

Pros:

• Command-line interface to use most of useful features.
• Works with inbuilt co mponent and Great Community

Cons:

• AngularJS expertise is required for complex features

Top 10 Hybrid mobile application development technology considerations What is hybrid mobile app development? There are many cross-platform mobile app development platforms available in the market like PhoneGap, Xamarin, Telerik AppBuilder and many more. We discuss here top ten technology considerations for hybrid mobile app development for your business idea. PhoneGap PhoneGap is an Open source technology to develop hybrid mobile applications using web technologies like HTML/CSS and JavaScript. PhoneGap is very popular hybrid mobile application tool among hybrid mobile application development companies in USA. PhoneGap uses JavaScript to access device level APIs similar to native app. Pros: Uses web technologies lie HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript Easily available source This is write one time and run anywhere – Android, iOS, Windows, Firefox OS, BlackBerry etc. Available in Google Pay Store for Android, integrated payments via App Store for iOS and in-app and more Cons: Poor performance for graphic-intensive applications Plugins are available however many are outdated or unsupported based on target platform. Read More: Expert Recommendations For Hybrid Mobile App Development Platforms Xamarin Xamarin, newly Microsoft acquired technology, is used to build native mobile applications with cross platform compatibility. It uses portable C# code. All codes are written using C# that developer can do in Java, Swift or Objective-C unlike other platforms. Xamarin studio is user friend IDE for the app development. Pros: Development is using C# so no need to learn near programming language Xamarin studio is highly user friendly IDE Code reusability is very high (almost 75%) across major mobile platforms like iOS, Windows, Android etc. Android Emulator for quality testing. Cons: Many open-source libraries for iOS, Android etc. have compatibility issues with Xamarin Onsen UI This is an open source framework and technology to build hybrid mobile apps using native looking components. AngularJS can also be used to build the apps. It has good documentation that includes good examples and layouts for common features. Pros: This works with predefined components Faster development as it is based on predefined components Good documentation with common features and examples Cons: PhoneGap/Cordova builder not included, but supported Currently does not support material Design Onsen UI currently offers only an iOS theme   Appcelerator Appcelerator is the technology used to build native apps using JavaScript technology . This is an enterprise based development platform allowing writing JavaScript with MVC framework.> Pros: Pre-built database connection for MS Azure, MongoDB, MS SQL and other database engines. Consists of schema-less data store, ArrowDB, to deploy data models with zero setup efforts. Allows rapid mobile app development Quick prototype development with less time and effort for evaluation Cons: Pre-built database connection for MS Azure, MongoDB, MS SQL and other database engines. Consists of schema-less data store, ArrowDB, to deploy data models with zero setup efforts. Allows rapid mobile app development Quick prototype development with less time and effort for evaluation Little buggy and laggy, though newere versions are more stable. Poor support from developers community Intel XDK Intel XDK is another popular platform to develop native apps for mobile phones and tablets using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Cordova platform is used to compile apps making them cross-platform compatible. Pros: Developer can compile same solution for different platform. HTML, CSS and JavaScript are used as technology for app development. Cons: “Native code” component of a plugin is not supported by simulator Device simulator’s emulation of the App Security API does not provide any real security Nativescript Nativescript is an open-source platform for making native cross-platform mobile applications. Nativescript gives mobile application development companies , every native APIs in JavaScript. It offers reusability of existing plugins from npm directly. Pros: Embedded support for TypeScript and js 2. Direct access to native APIs in place of development libraries access and then utilize native components. Cons: Multi-threading is an issue in Nativescript. Lack of in-depth examples and documentation on features and its usage.   Telerik AppBuilder The Telerik Platform is popular cross-platform mobile application development tool and it also supports native apps developing for iOS, Android and Windows phones. Appbuilder IDE supports Production of cross-platform and native applications both. AppBuilder also equipped with the Apache Cordova API. Pros: Easy to develop cross-platform application. It is compatible with .NET, JavaScript/HTML5, Java JSP and PHP technologies. Easy to learn Cons: It's not a free tool. One can convert all steps to code, but can't revert them back.   Monocross Monocross is an open source cross-platform for mobile application development. It is used to create applications for Android phones and tablets, Windows Phone and iPads and iPhones. It uses .NET C# and the Mono framework for developing cross-platform supported applications.   Pros: Need only C# and .NET compatibility for the application development and maintenance activities. Provides access to full power of the native device APIs still using C# Cons: Documentation and resource available for Monocross framework is harder for application development.   React Native React native supports creation of proper native apps in place of hybrid ones that run in Webview. JavaScript and React are used as technology for mobile app development. It also supports Android. Pros: Native-like performance Great community support Cons: The development tools only work on OS X at the moment Steep learning curve Planning to Hire Hybrid Mobile App Developer? Your Search ends here. See here Ionic Ionic is a popular framework of mobile app development companies for Hybrid mobile apps. One can use CSS to create native looking designs and best to pair with AngularJS. It also provides command-line interface that includes integrated emulators and a Cordova based app packager. Pros: Command-line interface to use most of useful features. Works with inbuilt co mponent and Great Community Cons: AngularJS expertise is required for complex features Conclution There is no best framework or platform to develop hybrid or native apps. Each has its own advantages and challenges. Platform choice depends heavily on project requirements in hand. Mobile application development companies should consider requirements in hand with features available in platform to decide the platform for the app. One should also consider performance and security parameters to choose the best suitable option for your requirements.